back to the handbook

make a standard student-friendly

Reviewed June 2026

Standards are written in teacher language. A model can quickly rewrite one so students can actually read it, and shorten it without much fuss. The catch is that "shorter" sometimes means "missing something," so the useful skill is reading the result with a critical eye.

Below is a worked example with three real eighth-grade reading standards. Pick one and step it through two rewrites: first into language an eighth grader could understand, then a shorter, plainer version. Watch what each prompt changes, and keep an eye on what the last step leaves out.

from teacher-speak to student-friendly

try it: translate a standard

Choose a standard, then press the button to run each rewrite. These are real AI outputs, lightly edited for length.

The first rewrite is the real win: a wall of teacher language becomes something a student can read on their own. The second step is where to slow down. Shorter is friendlier, but watch RL.8.1 lose "most strongly," or RL.8.2's "without giving your own opinion" hang on by a thread. Whether that matters is a judgment call, and it's exactly the call worth handing to students.

The same tool works in the other direction. Instead of breaking one standard down, it can braid several together, so a single project covers a whole cluster of standards at once, or reaches across subjects into a real interdisciplinary unit.

from one standard to a whole project

go further: combine standards

Pick a combination and generate a themed project that hits every standard at once. These are illustrative drafts, the kind of starting point a model hands you.

let students rewrite the standard

try with students

Before showing the AI version, have students do the translating themselves. It surfaces what they think a standard is actually asking, and gives them something to measure the machine against.

  1. translate it cold 5 min

    Put one standard on the board in its original teacher language. In pairs, students rewrite it in plain words a friend could understand. No phones, no AI yet.

  2. compare with the machine 5 min

    Show the AI's student-friendly version, or run it live with the tool above. Where did the AI get it right, and where did it lose something the standard actually means?

  3. simplify, then check 5 min

    Run the "simplify" step. Ask the room: did anything important get dropped when it got shorter? Point them at the small words that carry weight, like "most strongly" or "without giving your own opinion."

  4. post the keeper 3 min

    As a class, settle on one student-friendly version you would actually post on the wall: yours, the AI's, or a mix of the two. Talk through why that one earns the spot.

The same move works for assessment: paste a standard and ask the model for a single-point rubric, then read it with the same critical eye for what got dropped. We built a tool for exactly that, in single-point rubric maker.

back to the handbook